Hard STEM problem arrives
Source trigger
Expert-verified training data and reward signals, built for STEM, software, healthcare, finance, RL environments, and general knowledge work.
Real software engineering tasks with full agent trajectories, tool calls, and human acceptance signals. Nothing synthetic.
Connected clinical records across prescriptions, diagnostics, radiology, pathology, and drug grounding.
Specialists across software engineering, healthcare & finance.
Built with the people who do the work.
Showing STEM domain
Verify AI reasoning, check proofs, and train models that handle units, methods, and causation with real rigor.
Specialists derive the solution, check the proof, and attach a gold reference the model can learn from.
Source trigger
Specialist review
Verified by experts
Signal ready
Review AI code, write production-grade solutions, and shape the next generation of coding models.
Stack-matched engineers review the trace, flag failure modes, and turn the fix into reward signal.
Source trigger
Stack-matched review
Precise analysis
Reward ready
Evaluate earnings, filings, risk models, and trade rationale. Credentialed judgment, not pattern matching.
Credentialed analysts score the rationale, attach risk flags, and leave an audit trail with the signal.
Source trigger
Credentialed review
Compliance check
Signal ready
Prescription digitisation, diagnostic reasoning, radiology, pathology. 1M+ records grounded by experts.
Clinicians ground the record, check drugs and imaging, and ship outcomes with full clinical context.
Source trigger
Clinician review
Domain grounding
Signal ready
Teach AI to follow instructions, write clearly, and stop inventing facts. Judgment most people already have.
Readers rank tone and clarity, flag hallucinations, and publish preference signal models can train on.
Source trigger
Expert ranking
Factuality check
Signal ready
Three stages from source material to production-ready signals, with the same rigor across STEM, coding, finance, health, and generalist work.
Capture reasoning traces, tool calls, code edits, records, and source material from real production work.
Domain experts apply explicit rubrics and score the reasoning, method, tool use, and outcome.
Turn accepted work into evaluations, reward signals, and environments that retain source judgment.
{
"environment": "STEM",
"task": "selectivity-028",
"system": "Pd catalyst screen",
"conditions": "65°C · 12 h",
"variables": 18,
"result": "validated yield"
}{
"task": "build-regression / TS-184",
"suite": "34 tests · 3 services",
"stack": "TypeScript · Node",
"ci": "reproduced",
"reward": 0.91
}{
"env": "warehouse-routing / E-12",
"actions": 64,
"constraints": 8,
"success_rate": 0.912,
"episodes": 1200
}Expert-verified samples across STEM, software, healthcare, finance, RL, and knowledge work.
{
"case": "discharge-plan / 7A",
"guidelines": 4,
"findings": 12,
"safety": "complete",
"reviewer": "attending MD"
}{
"task": "portfolio-stress / Q3",
"holdings": 42,
"factors": 6,
"shortfall": "2.7%",
"audit": "locked"
}{
"task": "policy-brief / research",
"sources": 28,
"claims": 16,
"citations": "100%",
"hallucination": "none"
}Expert-verified samples across STEM, software, healthcare, finance, RL, and knowledge work.
{
"environment": "STEM",
"task": "selectivity-028",
"system": "Pd catalyst screen",
"conditions": "65°C · 12 h",
"variables": 18,
"result": "validated yield"
}{
"case": "discharge-plan / 7A",
"guidelines": 4,
"findings": 12,
"safety": "complete",
"reviewer": "attending MD"
}{
"task": "build-regression / TS-184",
"suite": "34 tests · 3 services",
"stack": "TypeScript · Node",
"ci": "reproduced",
"reward": 0.91
}{
"task": "portfolio-stress / Q3",
"holdings": 42,
"factors": 6,
"shortfall": "2.7%",
"audit": "locked"
}{
"env": "warehouse-routing / E-12",
"actions": 64,
"constraints": 8,
"success_rate": 0.912,
"episodes": 1200
}{
"task": "policy-brief / research",
"sources": 28,
"claims": 16,
"citations": "100%",
"hallucination": "none"
}Tell us about your model, your domain, and your gap. We'll scope the dataset or the system.